By A Staff Reporter
President Donald Trump’s leadership style has always been marked by rapid, often contradictory decisions. One day, he imposed steep tariffs on Canada and Mexico. The next, he froze auto duties for a month after realizing—just as experts had predicted—that they could cripple a key American industry.
His approach to foreign policy has been equally erratic. Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited the White House to sign a rare-earth minerals deal touted as a win for the U.S. But the meeting quickly descended into chaos when Vice President J.D. Vance provoked Zelensky, leading to his abrupt expulsion from the Oval Office—leaving European leaders scrambling to repair the fallout.
Meanwhile, billionaire Elon Musk is aggressively dismantling government agencies, firing workers indiscriminately, and throwing industries reliant on federal support into uncertainty just as the economy faces growing vulnerabilities.
/anm-english/media/post_banners/QYGOjSnNVjJO06AC6XBK.jpg)
A Leadership Without a Plan?
Initially, Trump’s energetic executive actions seemed like a stark contrast to the perceived stagnation of the Biden administration’s final months. But six weeks into his new term, his moves to dismantle post-Cold War security alliances, disrupt global free trade, and shrink the federal government seem more impulsive than strategic.
His decision-making process appears to be driven more by instinct than by a coherent vision. His tariffs, for example, aim to revive American industry but overlook key economic realities—such as high U.S. labor costs, which make domestic manufacturing inefficient for many industries. The structural trade deficit, which Trump seeks to eliminate, is largely a byproduct of the U.S. consuming more than it produces—a fundamental economic dynamic that tariffs alone cannot fix.
The Fallout of Trump’s Instinct-Driven Decisions
Trump’s unpredictable leadership is wearing down America’s allies. Canadian Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly described U.S. trade policy as a “psychodrama” her country cannot endure every 30 days. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has hinted at seeking alternative trade partners.
In Europe, Trump’s dismissive approach to NATO and foreign security commitments is prompting unprecedented shifts. French President Emmanuel Macron has suggested extending France’s nuclear umbrella to European allies in response to Trump’s volatile diplomacy. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in a pointed response to U.S. Vice President Vance’s dismissive comments about allied military contributions, honored British soldiers who fought alongside Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan.
/anm-english/media/post_banners/dMRvRiyYR7yNg3GWsR4f.jpg)
Chaos as a Political Strategy
For Trump’s base, his ability to enrage Democrats, the media, and foreign governments is a feature, not a bug. To right-wing populists, his dismantling of bureaucratic institutions represents a long-awaited deconstruction of the “administrative state.”
Trump’s method is one honed in the cutthroat world of Manhattan real estate—where making extreme demands, provoking adversaries, and shifting positions unpredictably can be powerful negotiation tools. However, while such tactics may work in business, they create instability in government, global diplomacy, and economic policy.
“Maybe the real goal isn’t tariffs or trade deals but the uncertainty itself,” said Julian Vikan Karaguesian, a former Canadian finance official now lecturing at McGill University. “The strategy seems to be cultivating chaos—keeping everyone guessing, exhausted, and off balance.”
For the world, the question is how long it can endure such unpredictability before seeking stability elsewhere.